The book is both an erotic novel and a comment on French high society and its sexual morals. The novel is conceived as a rendition of the work of an African chronicler, containing the account of king Mangogul, who is the 1,,th scion of a dynasty of kings of Kongo, a rather diffuse kingdom in Africa.
When one day the sultan is bored, his favourite concubine Mirzoza, who has a talent for storytelling, proposes to send for the genie Cucufa to provide some entertainment. The notables will not only risk to lose their reputation, they will have to adapt their habits and will become dependent on the powers of the new interrogating device.
Mirzoza and Mangogul now agree to hold a contest, since Mirzoza claims that the ring will prove that there are not only licentious, lusty, coquettish courtisan-women, but also loving and faithful wives. The king is sceptical, but he accepts the bet, cautiously refraining from pointing the ring at Mirzoza, since this would indicate that he does not trust her loyalty. But where is the reader? The reader is the book itself.
For it is a sensing, living, speaking book. He was especially interested in the life sciences and their impact on our traditional ideas of what a person — or humanity itself — are. He would never reject scientific change outright in the name of human dignity or the immortal soul. But he would worry about possibly warped views of what a person is, and hope for explanations that do justice to our own aesthetic, political, moral, creative urges as individuals and as citizens.
Festival of Social Science — Aberdeen, Aberdeenshire. He was imprisoned for three months and it was due to this reason that many of his novels and writings that oppose religion were never published during his lifetime. He sold his Library to Empress Catherine of Russia who made him their librarian and he worked and lived there till his death on July 30th, He remained anything but rich, but he no longer struggled as before to meet his basic needs.
With this liberation, a highly productive period in his life began as new and original books and other writings began to flow from his pen. His previous struggles still influenced this output, for after a stint in prison and two decades of surveillance and harassment by the French authorities responsible for the book trade, Diderot had become far more suspicious of publication than he had been in his youth.
His output during these years was great, and his correspondence reveals a lively circulation of his writings among trusted friends and collaborators. Many of his writings from this period were only discovered and published much later, some as much as a century after his death. Diderot also expressed an awareness of how his continual struggle with censors affected his manner of writing. Much better is to group his work thematically according to the broad clusters of thought that his books and other writings contributed to.
Some of these works passed directly into print, while others remained private works that Diderot kept from the public eye for reasons that are often hard to discern.
They also reveal his continuing interest in the epistemological problem of discerning the nature and principles of such a possibly God-less world. These themes run throughout the entire corpus of his work, and if these writings are different it is in his explicit engagement with explicitly materialist philosophical investigation as they related to the emerging biological sciences of the eighteenth century. In this way, Diderot the author moves between conscious and unconscious thought so as to shift perspectives and highlight the different possibilities that follow from these different points of view.
Taken as a whole, these three interconnected dialogues operate at two levels, inquiring at once into serious metaphysical and epistemological questions regarding a materialist understanding of being and order in the world, while at the same time staging a highly self conscious textual performance that brings into focus the style of the conversation attendant to the philosophical exchanges themselves. This is the central dialogue of the text. The third dialogue is shorter again, and involves only Doctor Bordeu and Mlle de Lespinasse discussing certain issues from the dream reporting at the heart of the main dialogue.
Topics here include monsters considered as biological and social problems, the relation between matter and sensation, and the nature of biological reproduction with explicit attention to its sexual dimension.
Overall, it is still an open question within Diderot studies why he wrote the work the way he did at the time when he wrote it, and how one should interpret the uniquely Diderotian mode of philosophizing present in the text.
What is clear, however, is that the creative complexity converges into what is without question one of the great masterpieces of Enlightenment philosophie. One important cluster concerns the theory and practice of theater. His meta-theoretical writings about theater itself, however, provide many interesting points of departure for his philosophy, and these will accordingly be discussed in Part II.
It strives to expose the novelistic conceit of bringing its readers into a staged world of realistically represented yet fictional human experience. Another site where Diderot manifest these same philosophical-literary tendencies was in his art criticism. Staged in the Louvre, these shows allowed painters and sculptors to showcase their work in a setting that gave a broad public audience unprecedented access to the work of the best artists of the day.
A new academically centered art theory had developed in the seventeenth century, and by this was starting to be transformed into a new philosophical science of aesthetics that spoke in general terms about ideal theoretical concepts like artistic truth and beauty and their manifestation through the work of practitioners of the fine arts. A new persona, the connoisseur, had also become visible by , a knower who helped collectors to hone their judgment in discerning truly great art while offering others the skills necessary to isolate real art from the mere craft of ordinary artistic production.
The bi-annual Parisian salons had already become a site of Enlightenment aesthetics and connoisseurship by , yet before Diderot no one had brought together the job of the connoisseur and the aesthetician with that of the public writer reflecting on art in relation to ordinary human experience.
In doing so, he invented a new identity defined by a new genre: the art critic sustained through contemporary art criticism. The social invention itself was transformative, but even more significant was the character of the art criticism that Diderot developed in his pioneering new role. Here Diderot worked through the medium of the painted image to explore exactly the same dynamics between form and content, author and interpreter, subject and object—in short, the very problem of artistic representation itself—that he also explored in his theater, literary fiction, and often in his philosophy as well.
The result was a general understanding of aesthetics and its relationship to ethics that was also integrally connected to his philosophy, and these ties will be discussed in detail in Part II. His explicitly metaphysical and epistemological writings about nature, its character, and its interpretation also join with this other work in forefronting writing and representation as an empowering act of conscious human being and knowing, but also as a fraught and frail human capacity full of limitations.
His best works are those that engage in both sides of this dynamic simultaneously in the manner of his literary and dialogic metaphysics and materialist natural philosophy.
And as the exchange carries on, one also comes to see the two characters as different sides of a deep existential dynamic that generates both the differences that sustain the banter and the never ending circle of their debates. Diderot did not publish Le Neveu de Rameau in his lifetime, but the text found its way to Germany after his death, where it was read by Friedrich Schiller and passed on to Johann Wolfgang von Goethe who then published a German translation of the text of his own making in From there, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel found the text, offering it as the only external work explicitly cited in his Phenomenology of Spirit first published in A line further connects Diderot and Le Neveu de Rameau with all subsequent metaphysical understandings of the self as a singularity caught in a constant struggle with universal forces pulling the unity of being apart.
It also connects the book with all metaphysical thinking after Hegel that posits being as a unity riven with dialectical oppositions striving to reconcile competing oppositions within being itself. In October , Diderot celebrated his sixtieth birthday in a coach headed for the Russian imperial capital of St.
0コメント