Indeed, this a classic case of the administrative distance between the U. S and India that Pfizer failed to consider. Similarly, Uniqlo learned the hard way in its previous foray into the UK in The group later closed most of its UK stores in Again, Uniqlo failed to grasp the cultural differences between the UK and Japan — the cultural distance between the two countries.
In other words, it puts the cart before the horse. For this reason among others, it failed miserably. Of course, there is nothing wrong with globalization per se. However, knowing that globalization works and grasping how it works are two different stories. The acronym stands for:. That is Adaptation, Aggregation, and Arbitrage. In other words, adapt your strategy by adjusting it to differences across countries or geographies — or group similar countries to overcome differences among them — or use arbitrage to exploit selected differences across countries.
Similarly, my experience suggests that you analyze international differences in industry profitability. When I first challenged by this idea, we tend to go back to those things and argue with them. Little by little, if we are honest with ourselves, it all begins to unravel. Some have become physicists and can fill huge black boards with mathematical equations. Look how well mathematical projections served us in the plandemic, and you will see how useless they are in the real world, when there are variables not accounted for.
Instead of arguing, it would be nice to get down to brass tacks of what we do know for sure, Versus what we speculate to be true. First off remember that the Bible is written by man. Man has the ability to change it in any form or way he sees fit to do so.
As far as god and thrones and such in the Bible speak of yawway that was the name of the Annunaki king that came here to rule it says we was made in his image the image of man the image of Annunaki. Most of the Bible has been changed or major parts left out to fit the narrative of those controlling things. Using the Bible as a reference to prove flat earth is not a good reference IMO because you are once again going on what controllers have placed in it.
Most people are seeing by now that the top level of the religions around the planet are curropt and have been hand picked for a reason. Lunar rocks cause weird things to happen when crushed to powered and applied like corn from seed to maturity in a week. So with so many lies can anyone really believe anything about what we know or have been taught. In Is 22 18 says ball and 40 says circle. Circle is not a sphere, so therefore we can not ASSUME that it is a sphere, the only reason you would think so is you are trying to fit the model, that you know into what the Bible says, instead of letting the Bible speak for itself.
The only other verse that I know people use is in Job where it says he hangs the world on nothing. When you build a house you hang your house on nothing meaning it is supported from a foundation below. Why would God create the law of centrifugal force only to counteract his own law with the law of gravity. Stars are NOT 3D there is no depth to stars that is why you can navigate by them.
The Bible says firmament meaning firm structure that is considered a heaven. I could go on and on, but you have to make that choice yourself. He is not only demanding it of Job but all of us. And which layer is the one solid enough to hold pressure? Not to mention flying around the sun at miles an hour. Man that could rip you arm off if you stick it out the window at miles an hour. Yet no one can feel it. Heven is above the dome. Good points, same I use every time I can.
The minimum speed to fly off into space is the same lowest orbit achieving speed or basic escape speed which was 17, miles per hour first achieved by the mission that put John Glen in low orbit. If it is spinning at mph, you would be able to fly from NY to LA, but not back! The air is pulled as fast as you take a plane flight and toss a ball in the air inside the plane the ball moves as if you are not moving the air in the plane moves with you.
The air molecules are moved out of the way by your body, and that pushes back against you. Why is water always level. No curve. When building train tracks there is no formula for curved surface. The air force even admitted flat surface when working on formulas. Check their documents.
We have been lied to for a very long time. We have achieved zero energy. And nuclear power. Kill our economy for years to come.
Lied to,manipulated. They want us to believe there is no God. We are easier to control that way! God Bless. Forget everything you think you know and do your own research. Our atmosphere moves with the earth. So whether your helicopter is in the air or sitting on the earth, it continues to move with the earth. Have you ever measured the surface of water? If you ever do, let us know.
No document admits a flat surface or a flat earth. Many flat earthers make the same claim you do, yet not one of them have ever produced a document stating the earth is flat. If the atmosphere moved with the earth then how do we feel wind?
This is the dumbest argument ever. None of which happens…all. Did you even go to school? The wind is caused by warm air currents rising over cool air currents. As the warm air rises, the cool air flows into the space that the warm air moved out of, thus creating wind. And as for how we can get to where we are going if the earth is rotating faster than us?
Just like a train can be going faster than a person, but someone running on top of the train can still get from one end to the other. Water does not bend! Construction have used water levels to level buildings for thousands of years, yet no round earther can produce a document to disprove this!
If there is no Firmament, how do we have atmospheric pressure? But the water in a spirit level is very small only existing over a minuscule amount of land. Perhaps if we were to build an enormous level across the world with cameras that could be placed into an array to display synchronised a flat view of the bubble as not to distort our perception we would see a curve within a seemingly to the naked eye flatly built structure expanding across a flat earth.
The reason we have no unified theory is that all theories are indeed incorrect but they keep them to make things happen. Science in itself admits broadly that it can make things happen by understanding some concepts within parameters that allow for control or manipulation. However they cannot merge many fields such as quantum mechamics and general relativity, I admit it has been some time I read into these fields but I have heard nothing drastic in report if a unification which I know there would be much talk of.
What I am saying. Is that God indeed created all of this. Gods will is not for us to fight. Lol Ps I have not proof read this so if there are any mistakes my apologies. Perhaps you should address the fact that people see much further, with the assistance of telephoto lenses, then the curvature of the earth should allow for. I would love to see such an experiment with even more powerful lenses. Experiments using lasers over long distances of water, being careful about the weather and other details, are pretty compelling.
When people see things very far away, they also note that the objects are still fully vertical. They should have a somewhat compressed appearance as if they are leaning away from us if they are on a globe, no matter what the atmospheric conditions are at the time. I think it would also be good for you to challenge and work on your assumptions about the atmosphere traveling with the globe.
Talk about a crosswind! But I hope you get my drift. Even if we do not perceive spinning east-west, something weird should happen if we are traveling north to south. How could they NOT have to accommodate if the landing strip is gone from north to south? If they have to course correct to get from New York to South America? None of that is happening, And no one calculated for that even before they had computers for airplanes.
Also, the earth is massive. I suggest you get a ping pong ball and a basketball. That is 15, followed by 22 zeros. No, it is not. They are both spherical, but they have a different curve. The angles are all the same, all angles add to Imagine you are the size of a flea on the surface of that basket ball. Would it not look flat to the flea where ever it looked around?
It, too, would see a flat horizon all the way around it from its perspective. When amateurs send a Camera to the same height, we see a flat earth. Pilots see a flat earth, as do passengers, unless the window is curved. NASA has presented us with a series of big blue Marble photos, round and globular. They proclaim that this is the earth.
But they got busted, Because they used a lot of CGI and claimed sometimes that pictures of Jupiter were taken in different years, And yet all of the details in the clouds etc.
Well, there is nothing pear-shaped about the pictures we have been shown of the earth. So apparently they were not just doing CGI on the continents and the cloud cover, apparently the entire shape of the world is wrong as well. I think some answers are long overdue. They also cannot think 3 dimensionally. Explain that, flat earthers! What is puzzling or historical accounts of people attempting to circumnavigate the southern hemisphere, experienced sea captains, navigating by the stars, who say that they traveled 50 to 70, miles during their circumnavigation, and the sea captains who found themselves unexpectedly on the wrong side of continents based on using the globe understanding.
And yet now, we are being told that the world is an oblate spheroid. Then we are told that it is pear-shaped, fatter on the bottom. If this is the case, NASA lied to us about their globe images. Or they are lying now. So… Your argument falls apart even before it gets started. It is pure speculation. PS, all ancient proofs of a globe also apply to the flat earth model. Most of them were simply repeating the lies that they had been programmed to teach.
Yeah but what happens setting off due South? Where would you end up then please explain good sir or sim or ger. So you are a street preacher that does not believe in the book of Genesis? The atmosphere and thus, the air is rotating with the earth. Research it, you may find this fascinating. Level does not mean the same as flat. No pilot believes the earth to be flat, either, as navigation only works on a globe. They all spew the same non-sensical rubbish which bears no resemblance to logic or reality.
There are weaponry experts in the military who do not account for curvature at all. Some of their systems are based on rather primitive predecessor systems and work just fine.
Not openly. As a reference it was surveyors in Florida that were working on the new bullet train going out to Port Cape Canaveral. I just recently noticed that In The Book Of Enoch he sees Earth under a dome when he rides through the sky with the messengers.
What your talking about is wind resistance, not the acceleration… if you accelerate from o to 40 mph you will feel it, but not while holding a steady 40 mph. Pick the smoothest road possible, shut the windows and drive at a steady 40 mph. BTW calling space a vacuum is wrong, a vacuum is the dragging force of moving air through a hose or duct, or the vacuum created in closed chamber, but space is not a created vacuum or held in an enclosure, but the original and complete absence of atmospheric air or other gases or matter.
Are you being serious. This is not an accurate post to state something like this. How does it compensate in that speed change? Conservation of momentum. Travel in a car at 60mph, apart from slight bumps and undulations in the road surface, going around bends, etc.
You only feel the acceleration or the slowing down because of inertia. Objects at rest tend to want to stay at rest unless acted upon, the same as objects in motion tend to want to stay in motion unless acted upon.
Basic high school level physics. Known as G Force gravitational acceleration.. For example, a merry-go-round thats 63 ft in circumference would go 2. Very slow. And you think you wont be able to feel the difference in speed between the two?? Wow is all I got to say to all yall. The centrifugal force of the earth is only enough to make you 5.
I think we all know that. Same as being in a car or in a plane. You may feel the tiniest of nudges when the merry-go-round started moving from a dead stop. And you may detect an equally tiny nudge forward when the merry-go-round stopped at the end of the ride.
Nothing in between. This is pretty basic stuff. You feel acceleration. You feel deceleration. You can only feel the starting and the stopping. And the birds see video. Would feel exactly the same. But there would be tons of air resistance at 1, mph from this very large fictional place where the earth-sized merry-go-round is located.
It would be very difficult to stay on this merry-go-round, but because of the air resistance, not speed or centrifugal force. Remember, the air around the merry-go-round is not moving, but you are moving at 1, mph. It would be the same as sticking your head out the window of a car going 1, mph.
Or riding a motorcycle at 1, mph. No detectable pulling to the outside either due to centrifugal force. On a merry-go-round this size, the rider would feel like they were travelling in a straight line. The curve of the merry-go-round would not be visible because of sheer size and perspective. You would have to move many miles above and away from the merry-go-round to start to even begin to see its round shape. Same as the horizons when you view the ocean. Looks flat — however, the curve is actually there.
But from your perspective it is so slight it is not detectable. Accelerating to 1, mph from being stopped, I think you would probably feel that, depending on how quick you accelerated. If that merry-go-ground came to a dead stop instantly, it would most definitely be fatal and you would be thrown hundreds of feet or more. Same as being thrown from a car that has hit a rock and come to a sudden stop.
So if some outside force caused the earth to come to a dead stop as it rotates? But no, you cannot feel your own speed if your surroundings and air around you are all moving at the same rate along with you. Same as cars, planes, rockets and merry-go-rounds. Otherwise kids would be falling off constantly.
It would be a bad scene. They typically run at 5. It has nothing to do with speed tangential velocity , just as Joe said. It rotates at about a maximum of 24rpm, and is roughly the same size as a carousel maybe a bit smaller at around 30 feet. Even stranger, though, is being pushed up helplessly against this wall, barely able to lift my arms or move my head — and all the while, the operator whose seat is in the middle of the circle, and is rotating in this machine every bit as fast I am on the outer edge, is calmly sipping his coffee and carrying on his business.
His relaxing ride is interrupted, however, when I beg him to help me find the wallet has been sucked by means of centrifugal force out of my pocket, through an opening in the wall of the ride. To give you the numbers, the Gravitron runs at a maximum of 24rpm, and is about 30 feet in diameter. Same goes for the fictional giant earth-sized merry-go-round. This is because the earth has a low rpm 0. Most of the movement they would actually be able to see would be from the movement of their own vehicle, usually moving much faster than 1, mph.
When a round object is spinning, most of the centrifugal force is exerted on the outer edge, furthest from the axis, the equator , and none is exerted at its axis the poles. Same goes for the earth. A person standing on the equator is experiencing all of the centrifugal force the earth has to offer. That same person standing at the north pole is experiencing none at all. Did they feel anything different?
Not likely. It would be anything more than 1g of centrifugal force at the equator, I suppose. And, according to all those 7th graders out there who have learned the the rule of Pi, the radius of the earth is: 3, So, according to my questionable math skills, more than 17, miles per hour would be the required rotation speed to offset the force of gravity and things would start to float and only if you were standing at the equator as opposed to the 1, miles per hour that you suggested was fast.
Nope, not at all. We would just start to feel a little light in our shoes. And that cranky carnival worker from the Gravitron? On a ft circumference merry-go-round, the rotation would be at 4.
But what about centrifugal force? Obviously not. Yeah, but if you travel in the opposite direction that the Earth is spinning you should definitely feel some resistance. You should feel that with the Earth as well. We are traveling the same speed as the train while we are on the moving train. If we walk up and down the train we are both traveling the speed of the train and our own speed while walking. Travelling through space is not the same as travelling on a road or through the atmosphere, there are no road bumps, irregularities, potholes, or turbulence, wind resistance, nothing to shake the ride, oppose resistance or even cause noise, or slow down the speed which btw is 67, miles per hour, not 6, If buses have a much smoother ride than cars, a cruise ship rides the sea much smoother than a small boat, etc.
So imagine the Earth as a huge vehicle that travels through nothingness, why should wee feel the ride? If Heaven is above the dome? Make up your mind!.. Thank you, but sadly people only believe what they want. No matter how much common sense you show them they will believe the fantasy because they want to.
Globe enthusiasts go to extremely complicated measures to explain the things that seem very nonsensical… We feel like we are on a solid immovable surface. What the heck do you expect people to believe anymore?
NASA is no longer even remotely reliable. Every freaking day. You do realize how big the earth is. There is no way of sensing speed unless it is relative to something. So when in space and every other star and planet are moving with you what are you measuring against. Rockets use jet propulsion aka pushing out matter in the form of flames and then pushing out more matter which pushes against the matter that has already been pushed out.
Now if our planet mad impact with a big asteroid well…. I truly believe that we live on a flat plane. Plane, planet- same. Flat plane ahead! Show me anywhere else other than your mind water sticking on a spinning ball???
No, huh? The centrifugal force generated by the earth at the equator only makes the oceans lighter by 5. This is insignificant compared to gravity the thing that pulls the water toward the center of the earth in the first place. A moon in the day is completely possible the sun is millions of miles away shines off the moon duh.
If you can zoom in on the Sun after it sets, then how is it ever night time? Particularly when flying at 40,ft up? Go ahead, have a look. Slowly pour a few drops of water on a flat and smooth surface, next see the curved shape the water drops have adopted.
So, water is much easier and more likely to be all wavy and curved than perfectly flat, and different forces wind, currents, gravity from all sides from Moon, Sun and from this planet shape it and curve it. Planet is English, plan latin, planeta spanish, etc. Also, you forgot to mention why Earth is called a globe. I great big glob of water, and sand, and stone. Yea, there are curves all over that water.. Your understanding is that rockets work in the atmosphere because they push against the atmospheric air… but Wrong!!
Physicist Isaac Newton explained it clearly. On flat earth, Sun and Moon travel at different speeds, the Sun goes around once a day while the Moon goes around once each 28 days, meaning the sun passes the Moon by once each day, and at the farthest point from each other it should be full moon for a few hours once a day be it day or night.
For the rest of world especially for those nearest to the Moon, it would be either of the four principal lunar phases: new moon, first quarter, full moon for farthest point on Earth , and last quarter also known as third or final quarter. But when the Moon is Full once a month, all people on Earth can see it Full from any point on the planet, and as well can see the four Lunar phases during the month, not every day as they would occur from different points on the planet every day.
Venus is closer to the Sun at million kilometers from it, while Earth is million kilometers from the Sun or 42 million kilometers farther than Venus. At the farthest point from Earth or on the other side of the Sun , the available time to see Venus should be shorter, and longer when its closer to Earth.. Edit; Aditional comment on parts illuminated by sunlight… You can input the time and date of the year in this interactive day and night map, and see what parts of the Earth get illuminated by sunlight on any day of the year… compare the result with a flat earth map when the Sun is on the same spot, and see how the flat earth model fails flat.
It also travels around the Sun faster than Earth Venus days at , kph vs Earth days at , kph. During the day Venus as well as the rest of the planets and stars disappears in the glare of the intense solar light… but at night on the flat earth, there would be no reason for the inner planets Mercury and Venus to disappear from our view… it only happens because they are on the other side of the Earth where it is daytime.
Flat-earthers would apply this idea to their flat earth but in their fake reality the stars and planets are always or more Km above the flat earth and never near on or under the ground… and close caption videos and photos of stars circling both the north and south Poles show stars diving into the horizon… normal speed images and videos show stars filling the sky from straight up down to the horizon, and that would not be possible on the flat earth because at the altitude of kilometers, the dome would stop the stars from getting close to the south pole or edge because it would go down as it neared the edge of the flat earth, and it the dome would reach an altitude of kms at approximately kms from the edge… that would leave a dark void of Kms around the horizon, from the ground to the stars.
In that case they would be right, but the impulse has to be greater than the weight of the rocket to make it move and depending on how great the impulse is, is how fast it can travel either in the atmosphere or in space. We can often read how great the impulse is for a specific rocket and that should give us a clue but these people prefer to ignore specific details that contradict their irrational logic. That is incorrect. You merely using confirmation bias willy nilly stating planet means plane.
Planet means wanderer. Lastly, the shape of the earth is a hindrance to certain technologies which has to engineer around the obstacles of a curved earth.
If you sit on a rotating stool, extend your arms and then quickly move them to the side, your body will rotate in the opposite direction. For the air to be responsible for this, it would have to have very high viscosity or even be solid. You can hold a long narrow rod with virtually no air resistance and get the same effect. Occasionally, it is possible to see the full moon briefly close to the horizon during sunset or sunrise.
Rapper B. B thinks the Earth is flat, has photographs to prove it. The flat-Earth community has its own celebrities, music, merchandise -- and a weighty catalog of pseudo-scientific theories. It's been the subject of a Netflix documentary and has been endorsed by figures including the rapper B. Each year, more flat-Earth events fill the calendar, organizers say.
But experts are wondering if the movement is really harmless -- and whether we're even approaching the edge of its influence. Falling off the edge. When Davidson first heard that people really do believe in a flat Earth, "I just laughed and said, 'they've got to be the stupidest people ever. A couple of years later, Davidson was setting up the first international flat Earth conference. Like most of the speakers at the event CNN spoke to, he was convinced after he decided he couldn't prove the Earth's roundness.
For Davidson, a born-again Christian, the most logical explanation for the conspiracy of the millennium goes like this: "Let's just say there is an adversary, there is a devil, there is a Satan. His whole job would be to try to convince the world that God doesn't exist. He's done an incredible job convincing people with the idea that we're just on a random speck in an infinite universe.
A digital illustration of a flat earth. The reality, says Davidson, is that the flat Earth, sun, moon and stars are contained in a "Truman Show"-like dome. From there, pitfalls can be easily dismissed -- like photos of the Earth from space, which flat Earthers believe are photoshopped. And Davidson quickly found a large online community believing the same thing. This is not just some internet fad, or a bunch of crazy people online. They're now meeting in buildings. He has a few things he wants to make clear to a flat-Earth novice.
Firstly, and most importantly -- "none of us believe that we're a flying pancake in space. The jury is out on gravity -- but as Davidson notes, no one has ever seen it. Secondly -- no, you won't fall off the edge. While flat Earthers' views of the world vary, most believe the planet is a circular disk with Antarctica acting as an ice wall barrier around the edge.
And thirdly, modern flat Earthers have little in common with the Flat Earth Society, a group that has existed for decades and has more than , followers on Facebook. That organization, some speakers told CNN, is a government-controlled body designed to pump out misinformation and make the flat-Earth cause sound far-fetched to curious minds.
Davidson calls their theories "completely ridiculous. But flat Earthers don't pretend to have all the answers. Several members of the community have carried out their own experiments, like bringing spirit levels onto airplanes, that have supposedly proved their thesis. They haven't. To be absolutely clear, the Earth is not flat -- as NASA explains in a fact sheet aimed at fifth to eighth graders.
0コメント